You're welcome to take anything from from here that may be of use. ...BC

#theory #viewing #vrheadset

I am volunteering to organize a resource for the community; a collection of stereoscopic images that could be used as standard test images. Basically our version of "Lena" or a "china doll" and a vers

#theory #viewing #vrheadset

I believe that fCarta can be used for phantograms, although I did not test it in this application. Yes, you can put the reference marks on the frame, but you could also use the frame corners themselve

#workFlow #software #softwareDev #theory

I took a quick look at the manual. https://www.drivehq.com/file/df.aspx/publish/itsikw/fCarta/fCarta%20User%20Manual%20version%203.pdf Given the reference mark preparation that has to be used to align

#workFlow #software #softwareDev #theory

I have just uploaded a new and improved version of our free photo registration software fCarta. It was designed with 3D lenticular photography in mind, but may be useful for stereoscopic photography t

#workFlow #software #softwareDev #theory

Not so, at least in the HTML5 viewer where we can see the image both the black and the white rectangles are at screen depth (they have zero disparity in the HTML5 viewer). What is floating in space is

#alignment #hasImages #theory

Hmm, I see that Francois has already replied... But I think you need to decide what you mean by "fake". If you mean an"illusion" then - as you should know by now - stereoscopy itself is an illusion! B

#alignment #hasImages #theory

> Do you mean this? Yes, exactly ! > Of course there is no window violation because the black "window" is a fake. The real window is the white one I would disagree with this. The white area shows the

#alignment #hasImages #theory

Do you mean this? http://la3dclub.com/html/competition/june2020/standard/June_Standard.htm?32.jpg (from a LA3D competition that is just announced recently) Of course there is no window violation becau

#alignment #hasImages #theory

I think this discussion focuses too much on technicalities and not enough on common sense ! Of course if a branch sticks out of the stereo window but is cut off by the top of the frame, it will look d

#alignment #hasImages #theory

You are quite correct, Antonio. There is no retinal rivalry, and no window violation in either image. However, from an artistic standpoint, the uncropped version is a better composition. As far as "co

#alignment #hasImages #theory

Here is the same image with texts along the upper and lower borders: https://stereopix.net/photo:9ON3D8R7dg/ The upper text appears behind the protruding branch, which looks dreadful but I would not c

#alignment #hasImages #theory

What causes items crossing the top or bottom borders to be seen as window violations is that items in violation of the window get occluded (i.e. cut off or covered by the substance of the frame) when

#alignment #hasImages #theory

To contribute to this discussion of the WV I have just shot two stereo pairs with a tree branch protruding inside the window. In one case the branch does not interfere with any border, so there is cle

#alignment #hasImages #theory

JackDesBwa said "The way I perceive it is that if the sides are at a certain depth and the canvas is rectangular, the top and bottom are imagined in the same plan and thus elements in front of it can

#alignment #hasImages #theory

This opposition is clearly a terminology problem concerning what means a window violation (WV). If you consider that the WV is the rivalry caused by a part of the content in front that should be displ

#alignment #hasImages #theory

JMH/trivision3d France : John A. Rupkalvis: someone who understands ..... hou la la; It's rare ! I "love" this guy :-) (French)John A. Rupkalvis: quelqu'un qui comprend ..... hou la la; C'est rare! "J

#alignment #hasImages #theory

Regarding the two meter comment, that has nothing to do with it. It does not matter if the image is a distant scenic, either normal or hyper, or even an extreme close-up or macro shot, at any camera d

#alignment #hasImages #theory

I meant exactly what I said. Even objects that were close to or even touching the top or bottom edges would not cause a violation unless they also crossed the left or right edge, in which case it woul

#alignment #hasImages #theory

I sketched the illustrations and deleted their original after I sent the message, sorry. However, I rebuilt an image based on the LRL of the previous mail so that it can be displayed by a 3D viewing s

#alignment #hasImages #theory